Wednesday, October 10, 2007
Trucker hat
Wes Anderson deliberately tries to make cult films. It isn't a surprise that prefabricated cult films have come into existence, but we should still take notice. I doubt that he knew what he was doing when he made "Rushmore" -- which filmed the combined fantasy boyhoods of himself and the Wilson brothers as though they were Godard films. However, with the film's success, he believed he had discovered his style. What he had in fact discovered was his audience. This explains the estranged, polite distance he keeps from his characters in the later films -- he does not explore them; he accessorizes them. It also indicates why each of the most recent three films are organized around collectives -- stand-ins for the audience -- that face casually meaningless trials to awesome pop soundtracks. If post-suburban white kids do anything other than recognize a simplified reflection of themselves in Anderson's protagonists, they are seeing too much, or not enough.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
7 comments:
yeah, exactly. why the last two have nothing approaching the freshness of "rushmore." did you see "darjeeling" (yet)? i'm looking forward to mildly enjoying it.
by the way, "in rainbows" is totally lovely.
nicely written, boss. and it rather sums up why all my 90s enthusiasm for WA has leaked away and, for the first time, i won't be paying $11 to see hiw newest in a theater.
seriously!
the best thing to come out of Life Aquatic was the giant group of people who showed up at last year's halloween Critical Mass-querade as team Zissou.
darjeeling will wait for DVD, me thinky.
am enjoying a series of movies and books featuring earnestness.
I am unconvinced that Life Aquatic fits the description. I can't imagine many post-suburbanites identify with being a painfully timid Kentucky pilot (just to pick the easiest character).
-dread pirate anon
Hm. How much does this character tell us about being a pilot and being from Kentucky? Does the character tell us more about being painfully timid?
Wait - you're not painfully timid, are you? -dpa
No, I don't think so.
Post a Comment